November 2003 might go down
in history as the month that Google shook a lot of smug
webmasters and search engine optimization (SEO) specialists
from the apple tree. But more than likely, it was just a
precursor of the BIG shakeup to come.
Google touts highly its secret PageRank algorithm. Although
PageRank is just one factor in choosing what sites appear
on a specific search, it is the main way that Google determines
the "importance" of a website.
In recent months, SEO specialists have become expert at
manipulating PageRank, particularly through link exchanges.
There is nothing wrong with links. They make the Web a
web rather than a series of isolated islands. However, PageRank
relies on the naturally "democratic" nature of
the web, whereby webmasters link to sites they feel are
important for their visitors. Google rightly sees link exchanges
designed to boost PageRank as stuffing the ballot box.
I was not surprised to see Google try to counter all the
SEO efforts. In fact, I have been arguing the case with
many non-believing SEO specialists over the past couple
months. But I was surprised to see the clumsy way in which
Google chose to do it.
Google targeted specific search terms, including many of
the most competitive and commercial terms. Many websites
lost top positions in five or six terms, but maintain their
positions in several others. This had never happened before.
Give credit to Barry Lloyd of www.SearchEngineGuide.com
for cleverly uncovering the process.
For Google, this shakeup is just a temporary fix. It will
have to make much bigger changes if it is serious about
harnessing the "democratic" nature of the Web
and neutralizing the artificial results of so many link
exchanges.
Here are a few techniques Google might use (remember to
think like a search engine):
1.Google might start valuing
inbound links within paragraphs much higher than links that
stand on their own. (For all we know, Google is already
doing this.) Such links are much less likely to be the product
of a link exchange, and therefore more likely to be genuine
"democratic" votes.
2.Google might look at the
concentration of inbound links across a website. If most
inbound links point to the home page, that is another possible
indicator of a link exchange, or at least that the site's
content is not important enough to draw inbound links (and
it is content that Google wants to deliver to its searchers).
3.Google might take a sample
of inbound links to a domain, and check to see how many
are reciprocated back to the linking domains. If a high
percentage are reciprocated, Google might reduce the site's
PageRank accordingly. Or it might set a cut-point, dropping
from its index any website with too many of its inbound
links reciprocated.
4.Google might start valuing
outbound links more highly. Two pages with 100 inbound links
are, in theory, valued equally, even if one has 20 outbound
links and the other has none. But why should Google send
its searchers down a dead-end street, when the information
highway is paved just as smoothly on a major thoroughfare?
5.Google might weigh a website's
outbound link concentration. A website with most outbound
links concentrated on just a few pages is more likely to
be a "link-exchanger" than a site with links spread
out across its pages.
Google might use a combination of these techniques and
ones not mentioned here. We cannot predict the exact algorithm,
nor can we assume that it will remain constant. What we
can do is to prepare our websites to look and act like a
website would on a "democratic" Web as Google
would see it.
For Google to hold its own against upstart search engines,
it must deliver on its PageRank promise. Its results reflect
the "democratic" nature of the Web. Its algorithm
must prod webmasters to give links on their own merit. That
won't be easy or even completely possible. And people will
always find ways to turn Google's algorithm to their advantage.
But the techniques above can send the Internet a long way
back to where Google promises it will be.
The time is now to start preparing your website for the
changes to come.
|