| More links mean
a site must have good content, right? And more links mean
more site visitors, right? And surely more links mean better
rankings in search engines, right?
Wrong. None of the above is true. In some cases each could
be true, but only if you delve a little deeper into the
realities of linking in the online world. If a year ago
search engine optimization was all the rage, nowadays it's
link popularity, and this new kid in town is a mighty popular
one.
But while you go about the process of building links, thinking
people will beat a path to your site and your search engine
rankings will improve, think again. As a measure of quality,
rankings improvement, and traffic, link popularity has five
major flaws, which explains why search engines can't rely
on it too heavily, if at all.
1. New Sites Have No Links
Assume that tomorrow we launch a medical-information site
with the deepest and highest quality content of any other
site in existence. I'm talking "written by the hand
of God"-quality content. The only links we can be assured
of are the ones we pay for at Yahoo!, LookSmart, NBCi, and
Inktomi. The rest we have to get online and make happen.
You know the drill -- submit to other engines and ask for
links on similar sites or topical directories, engines,
and site lists. This is what I do every day for a living.
Believe me, all of those medical sites with a few years'
head start and 1,500 links are going to be ahead of us for
a long, long time, even if our content is better. This example
alone proves why links are both a weak metric to use as
an indicator of quality and why they're prejudiced against
new sites.
2. Links Below Site Level Two Don't Exist
Most search engines index only content in the top two levels
of your site. They have no idea that links exist beyond
the secondary level simply because they don't search beyond
the secondary level. Let's say you have links built to your
site from other sites. If these links exist beyond the spiders'
allowable depth of travel, they will NEVER be counted. In
other words, if you have 5,000 links pointing at your site,
but all of them exist on pages beyond the second directory
level, a search engine will determine that your site has
zero links.
3. Email Links Can't Be Counted
Users spend more time using email than they do surfing
the Web. If my site is reviewed in a newsletter that is
emailed to 500,000 readers, a search engine doesn't have
a clue about it. But I'll take that review and the 100,000
or so new site visitors it sends me any day. Wouldn't you?
4. Spoofers, Free-for-Alls, and Link Schemes
Abound
Any time a search engine comes up with a new way to rank
pages, someone comes up with a way to trick the search engine.
There are already countless links page generation scams
and link pyramid schemes where everyone agrees to add your
link, and you agree to host the same links page as everyone
else.
Forget the quality of the sites themselves, just add the
links page to your server. Silly. Any search engine can
spot this scam through simple sniffer scripts. Add your
link to 6,000 pages in 30 seconds? Ooh, the quality of that
content must be something to see.
5. Unauthorized URLs Are Submitted to
Search Engines
When the search engine folks first decided to count links,
I don't think they ever thought it would inspire people
to begin submitting more links than they ever had, including
other people's pages. For instance, a marketer has a site
and finds a link to his site on another site. In an effort
to be sure the search engines know that site has a link
to his site, he submits that site to the search engines
through the "Add URL" form. Now multiply this
marketer's actions times a billion and that's exactly what's
happening every day -- people submitting other people's
links page to the search engines. This is actually counterproductive
because if I found out my links page was being submitted
by others I had linked to, I'd pull it from my server.
I've just scratched the surface on the shortcomings of
link popularity. Some of them can be fixed, others cannot.
And remember, I love the link. I am 100 percent pro-link.
The link is literally my life and livelihood. But that's
why I study this crazy stuff because there are right and
wrong reasons to pursue links, right and wrong ways to ask
for them, right and wrong reasons to want them in the first
place. Links, in the right places, will determine your ultimate
success. And the right places will not be search results
|